
Hein-Jan ter Meulen
Functie
Expertise
Hein-Jan is a specialist in commercial and corporate law dispute resolution. He began his career as a lawyer in 2012 at a specialised niche firm in Amsterdam. Hein-Jan handles complex contractual disputes and liability issues. These include disputes concerning the formation, interpretation, performance or non-performance, and termination of commercial agreements, directors’ liability, and acquisition disputes (such as warranty breaches and earn-out issues). He also regularly litigates before the Enterprise Chamber in inquiry cases involving breakdowns in the relationships within companies and on behalf of shareholders in exit disputes. Hein-Jan has also litigated and advised on collective actions (mass damage claims).
Hein-Jan has furthermore served as a regular and commercial judge at the District Court of Midden-Nederland and is still active there as a substitute judge. As a judge, he has gained extensive experience in civil procedural law and in the handling and assessment of a wide range of commercial and corporate law disputes, often in line with his experience as a lawyer.
This background allows Hein-Jan to combine a pragmatic approach focused on the interests of his clients with in-depth litigation experience and judicial expertise.
Hein-Jan has been working at Köster since September 2025. In 2012, he started as a lawyer at De Breij Evers Boon and then (from 2018) at Evers Soerjatin. In 2019, Hein-Jan moved to the judiciary, where he worked as a judge until the autumn of 2023. He then returned to the legal profession, first at Evers Soerjatin and then at Köster. In 2018, Hein-Jan completed the Grotius specialisation course in Company and Corporate Law cum laude.
Hein-Jan is a member of the Corporate Litigation Association, the Dutch Association for Procedural Law, and the Association for Mass Damage and Collective Actions. Hein-Jan also regularly publishes on corporate and procedural law topics. An overview of publications can be found below:
- Annotatie bij: Rb. Limburg 11 juni 2025 (gedwongen tussenkomst), Jurisprudentie Burgerlijk Procesrecht (‘JBPR’), december 2025
- Kroniek collectieve acties en schikkingen 2024, in: Geschriften vanwege de Vereniging Corporate Litigation 2024-2025 (VDHI nr. 194), juli 2025
- Nederland claimland? Over de bevoegdheid van de Nederlandse rechter bij internationale beleggingsschade , Tijdschrift voor de Ondernemingsrechtpraktijk (‘TOP’), augustus 2019
- Kroniek enquêterecht 2018, in: Geschriften vanwege de Vereniging Corporate Litigation 2018-2019 (VDHI nr. 157), Mei 2019
- Annotatie bij: Hof Den Haag 3 juli 2018 (geschillenregeling), Jurisprudentie Onderneming & Recht (‘JOR’), maart 2018
- Annotatie bij: Hof Amsterdam (OK) 28 februari 2018 (enquêteprocedure), Jurisprudentie Onderneming & Recht (‘JOR’), februari 2018
- Wenk bij: HR 24 maart 2017, ECLI:NL:HR:2017:484 (Hanzevast c.s./G4 c.s.). Rechtspraak Ondernemingsrecht (RO 2017/43), juni 2017
- Aandeelhoudersovereenkomst: van doorwerking en besluiten tot ontslag van een bestuurder, Tijdschrift voor de Ondernemingsrechtpraktijk (‘TOP’), mei 2015
Onze Dispute resolution experts
meer weten over Dispute resolution
how can we help you?
We will contact you within one working day










